Cases 51 - 60 of 249
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00447
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Kim Butler, Richard Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasha Talafhah v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1783
Defendant / Appellee:
BEATRICE CALHOUN, JOHN R. BALDWIN, MARGARET BURKE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RASHA B. TALAFHAH
Nathaniel Frenard v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 19-1770
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHANIE DORETHY, LOIS LINDORFF, KUL SOOD, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL FRENARD
Williams v. Wexford Healthcare et al
as 3:2019cv50091
Defendant:
Dr. Obassi, John R. Baldwin, Henry Hill Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tosh v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2019cv04081
Plaintiff:
Jason Tosh
Defendant:
Mendi Pilger, Henry Hill Correctional Center, Stephanie J Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tom Tuduj v. Steven Newbold, et al
as 19-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOM TUDUJ
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, in his capacity as Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, STEVEN M. NEWBOLD, Doctor, Dental Director, GEORGE HENDERSON, DDS and others
Parker v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv02261
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, IDOC Records Office and Glenn Jackson
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roman v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv01104
Defendant:
C/O Vinson, . Ellis, Riliwan Ojelade and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Roman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Coffey v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST COFFEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE, ROBERTA FEWS, Deputy Diretor of Department of Corrections, MELVIN HINTON, Chief of Mental Health and Psychiatric Services and others
Williams v. Catt et al
as 3:2019cv00329
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, David W. Rains, Robinson Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Montez Rashaad Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
