Cases 51 - 60 of 2,072
Kenny, Kelvin v. Doe, John and Jane et al
as 3:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Marshall Kenny
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe, Caroline Pace, Kimberly Listcheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2023cv14607
Plaintiff:
Anthony T Howell
Defendant:
F.B.I., U.S. Marshals and U.S. Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mullen v. Loreal USA Inc et al
as 1:2023cv14593
Plaintiff:
Marshall Mullen
Defendant:
Loreal USA Inc, Loreal USA Products Inc, Namaste Laboratories LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall vs. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14554
Plaintiff:
Mary Marshall
Defendant:
AFAM Concept Inc. dba JF Labs Inc., Avlon Industries Inc, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wallace v. Chevron USA, Inc.
as 3:2023pq03217
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Marshall Wallace
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARTER-RADER v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE JO CARTER-RADER
Defendant:
CENTURION, T. HOLLER, BETH MOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13856
Plaintiff:
Tamika Marshall
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kleinberg v. U.S. Federal Court et al
as 1:2023cv13827
Plaintiff:
Monisha Kleinberg
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Court, U.S. Marshals and U.S. Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MARSHALL v. Revlon Inc et al
as 1:2023cv12989
Plaintiff:
ANITA MARSHALL
Defendant:
Revlon Inc, LOreal USA Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
