Cases 51 - 60 of 14,505
Mazzucco v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
Dominic Gabriel Mazzucco
Respondent:
Warden Steven R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Shane R Dins
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mayberry v. Buss et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Defendant:
Edwin G Buss, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01374
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Gwen R. Vaughn
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta, AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, M. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodus, Jr. v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Rhodus, Jr.
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ford v. Little et al
as 3:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Allen Ford
Defendant:
R. Little, Major Ford, Jamar A. Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Little et al
as 4:2024cv04094
Plaintiff:
Allen Ford
Defendant:
R Little, Major Ford, Jamar A Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREW HAMM v. ERIC R. DUVENDACK et al
as 1:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
ANDREW HAMM
Defendant:
ERIC R. DUVENDACK and VENTURE EXPRESS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
