Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Stovall v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv03298
Plaintiff:
Bernetta Stovall
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Dyori et al
as 3:2017cv50025
Plaintiff:
Walter Robinson
Defendant:
Diane Dyori, Lawrence Smith, Nicholis Pottinak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El v. Brown et al
as 1:2016cv09226
Plaintiff:
Grace Stovall El
Defendant:
Ingrid Brown, Mark Ricks, Amy McCarty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stovall El v. Racker et al
as 1:2016cv09227
Plaintiff:
Grace Stovall El
Defendant:
Darlene Racker, Lester Racker, Lester Racker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kurt Stovall v. Daniel Grohen, et al
as 16-2245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KURT D. STOVALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL GROHEN, SONIA WILLEY and MARY B. SCHOLTEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00786
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stovall v. City of Chicago Department of Police et al
as 1:2016cv04004
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
City of Chicago Department of Police, Peter Delgado, Officer Janusonis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stovall et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03596
Plaintiff:
Veronica Stovall and Ronnie Stovall
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richemont International SA, et al. v. Liang
as 1:2016cv01227
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA , Cartier International A.G. , Montblanc-Simplo GMBH and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Luo Liang, 170008559lin min and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
