Cases 61 - 70 of 245
Neat v. Chicago Transit Authority et al
as 1:2015cv09130
Plaintiff:
Anndrewnettea Neat
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 241, Medrick Bussie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Mystic Blue Cruises, Inc. v. Acevedo
as 1:2015cv06230
Plaintiff:
Mystic Blue Cruises, Inc.
Defendant:
Jean Carlos Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Skibicki v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2015cv04600
Plaintiff:
Richard Skibicki
Defendant:
Edward Acevedo and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01104
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Acevedo v. Sergio's Tree Removal, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00218
Plaintiff:
Noe Acevedo
Defendant:
Sergio's Tree Removal, Inc. and Sergio Navarro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Demetrius Hampton v. Linda Miller, et al
as 14-2870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS M. HAMPTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA MILLER, Mail Room Supervisor, in her individual and official capacity, STEVEN R. GANS, Correctional Counselor II, in his individual and official capacity, GARY L. PAMPEL, Correctional Liesure Activity Specialist II, in is individual and official capacity and others
Dorcus Withers v. Wexford Health Sources, Incorp, et al
as 14-2273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DORCUS WITHERS
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, LOIS MATHES, in her official and individual capacities, DOCTOR SHUTTA and others
USA v. Fernando Acevedo-Marchan
as 14-1972
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FERNANDO ACEVEDO-MARCHAN
CALDERON-ACEVEDO v. USA
as 1:2014cv00514
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO CALDERON-ACEVEDO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
