Cases 61 - 70 of 85
CHANDLER v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv00982
Petitioner:
GARY CHANDLER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANDLER v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00414
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA F. CHANDLER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CHANDLER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2014cv01380
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CHANDLER
Defendant:
COMMANDER, GATES, HURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. BROWN
as 1:2014cv01345
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
KEVIN CHANDLER
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANDLER v. MEETINGS & EVENTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 3:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
MARYBELLE J CHANDLER
Defendant:
MEETINGS & EVENTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CHANDLER v. BROWN
as 2:2013cv00372
Respondent:
BROWN
Petitioner:
KEVIN CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANDLER v. BROWN
as 2:2013cv00316
Respondent:
BROWN
Petitioner:
KEVIN CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANDLER v. ZATECKY
as 1:2013cv00838
Petitioner:
KEVIN CHANDLER
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv00438
Petitioner:
Kyle Chandler
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANDLER v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00207
Petitioner:
KEVIN CHANDLER
Respondent:
MR. HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
