Cases 61 - 70 of 17,912
Diaz v. Cook County CC et al
as 4:2024cv04126
Defendant:
Shawnee (Medical Unit), Rushville Detention Facility and Cook County CC
Plaintiff:
Mario Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Ulrick et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Defendant:
Austin Mark, Tyler Walden, Ethan Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alan Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Ulrick et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Defendant:
Tyler Walden, Austin Mark, Ethan Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alan Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
HENRY L. COOK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nathaniel Richmond, Jr. v. Toyota Financial Services, et al
as 24-2183
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL J. RICHMOND, JR.
Defendant:
SCOTT COOKE and TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES
Smith v. DCFS-Dept Children Family Service et al
as 1:2024cv05830
Defendant:
Cook County Public Defender Off., Cook County Jail, Ada S. McKinley Service Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Smith and Renee A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tonnette Jones v. Avik Das, et al
as 24-2166
Defendant:
CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUDGE, EILEEN KINTZLER and AVIK DAS
Plaintiff:
TONNETTE JONES
Arnold III v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv05871
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office, Thomas J. Dart and Cook County Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sonny et al
as 1:2024cv05805
Defendant:
Rocco, Supv. Fenderson, Cook County IL and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
