Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Williams, Victor v. Rosandich, Eric et al
as 3:2016cv00550
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Williams
Defendant:
Eric Rosandich, Timothy C. Nichols and Jackson County, Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YATES v. JACKSON COUNTY JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER
as 4:2016cv00048
Defendant:
IDA AUFFENBURG, TONY FLEETWOOD, SUE GANS and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ANTHONY YATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DeKalb County Indiana et al v. Black Knight Real Estate Data Solutions LLC
as 3:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
DeKalb County Indiana , Howard County of Indiana , Jackson County Indiana and others
Defendant:
Black Knight Real Estate Data Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Oliver v. Schwartz et al
as 3:2015cv00059
Petitioner:
King Michael Oliver
Respondent:
William Schwartz and Sgt. Bludworth and Company of the Jackson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lamano v. FBI et al
as 1:2014cv01442
Plaintiff:
Christina Lamano
Defendant:
FBI, Jeremy H Lamano, Sr., Mark E Gilles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Jackson County Sherriff Department et al
as 3:2014cv01102
Plaintiff:
Wilson Franklin
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2014cv00457
Defendant:
CHRIS EVERHART, JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY C. MITCHELL, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHACHEL v. SHERIFF OF JACKSON COUNTY
as 4:2013cv00130
Petitioner:
BRIAN M. SCHACHEL
Respondent:
SHERIFF OF JACKSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
