Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Weaver v. Dickson et al
as 3:2018cv50259
Defendant:
Robert Weist, Rockton Police Department, Ronald Dippel and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ramsey v. Unknown John Doe Officers
as 1:2018cv04698
Defendant:
UNKNOWN JOHN DOE OFFICERS
Plaintiff:
Starr Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GERRISH v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv02021
Plaintiff:
CHARITY GERRISH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER #2, FNU EDWARDS, RONALD REHMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01984
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE (WITNESS), JOHN DOE (OFFICER) and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zsoch Dunn v. Oak Lawn Police Department, et al
as 18-2127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZSOCH DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
OAK LAWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAYOR OF CITY OF OAK LAWN, SANDRA BURY and others
Smith, Antonio v. Kolbo et al
as 3:2018cv00385
Plaintiff:
Antonio J. Smith
Defendant:
Kolbo , John Doe Officers, John Doe Sgt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erick Coleman v. Calumet City, Illinois, et al
as 18-2049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERICK B. COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CALUMET CITY, ILLINOIS, OFFICER BRASEWICZ, Badge #249 and JOHN DOES, Officers
Salinas v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01925
Plaintiff:
Julio Salinas
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Officer Sylvester, John Doe Officer # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. City Of Dixon et al
as 3:2018cv50085
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Hawkins
Defendant:
City Of Dixon and John Doe Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE et al v. MCELFRESH et al
as 1:2017cv04005
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BOWSER and KRISTINA WHITE
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE OFFICERS, CRAIG MCELFRESH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
