Cases 61 - 70 of 1,722
De La Cruz Martinez et al v. The Superior Court Of Pensylvania
as 3:2024cv50250
Defendant:
The Superior Court Of Pensylvania
Plaintiff:
Zoe Martinez, Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez, Aneesa Lynn Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Rodriguez v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50233
Petitioner:
Julian Martinez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Escalante-Martinez v. Vigare
as 1:2024cv04937
Plaintiff:
Allison Amarylis Escalante-Martinez
Defendant:
Nicholas Joseph Vigare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50223
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Defendant:
COATIE, R. ALLEN, SEVIER and others
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Mclean
as 2:2024cv00700
Defendant:
Joseph A Mclean
Plaintiff:
Martinez M Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04580
Defendant:
SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Strength of Nature LLC, Loreal USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
De La Cruz Martinez v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv50211
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Bobbi Jo Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50212
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
