Cases 71 - 80 of 4,659
Jane Doe v. Richard Macleod, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MARGARET BURKE, TODD SEXTON and RICHARD MACLEOD
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sistrunk v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03393
Plaintiff:
Ronnie M. Sistrunk
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Transit Authority, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler-Martin v. Snell et al
as 3:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Reginald Chandler-Martin
Defendant:
. Snell, L Adams, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wabash County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Chad Jackson
Defendant:
Wabash County Sheriff, Brooke Murphy, Ms. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jane Doe v. Prairie Ridge Health, Inc., et al
as 24-1631
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Defendant:
PRAIRIE RIDGE HEALTH, INC. and PRAIRIE RIDGE HEALTH FOUNDATION, INC.
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1622
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES, JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor and others
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1621
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES, JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
