Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Brant v. Wilson et al
as 3:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Philip J Brant
Defendant:
William Wilson and Lt Cane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley Felton v. Peter Ericksen, et al
as 09-2450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY FELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER ERICKSEN, PATRICK BRANT, Captain, LIZ LEMERY and others
Wallis v. Levine et al
as 1:2008cv06579
Plaintiff:
Scott Wallis
Defendant:
Alvin Levine, Barry Coudes, Baby's Room USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brant v. Superintendent
as 3:2008cv00524
Petitioner:
Philip J Brant
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 1:2008cv04908
Plaintiff:
Brant W. Scott
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, Commonwealth Edison Co. and Exelon Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jose Soto v. Dan Bertrand, et al
as 08-2540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE SOTO
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL BERTRAND, PATRICK BRANT, Captain, MARK STUTLEEN, Lieutenant, Lieutenant and others
Carter et al v. Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00209
Plaintiff:
David R Carter, David R Carter, David R Carter and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc and Tyson Fresh Meats Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MADDOX et al v. POLLARD et al
as 3:2008cv00227
Petitioner:
CORNELIUS R. MADDOX and STANLEY FELTON
Respondent:
WILLIAM POLLARD, Lt. William Swiekatowski, Lt. Mark W. Lesatz and others
Defendant:
Peter I Ericksen and HEYLEY HERMANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kafi v. Frank et al
as 2:2007cv00759
Plaintiff:
Damali Mudina Kafi
Defendant:
Matthew J Frank, William J Pollard, Michael Baenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Brant et al
as 3:2007cv00529
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Daniel C. Brant, Jr., Daryla R. Brant, Trustbank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
