Cases 71 - 80 of 840
LYONS v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
CALVIN LYONS
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORR v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledesma v. Gary Railway Company et al
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Frank Ledesma
Defendant:
Gary Railway Company, United States Steel Corporation and Terry Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
VERBLE v. ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
SHAWN J. VERBLE
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, FRANK P LLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMULLIN v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00440
Petitioner:
SHAWN MCMULLIN
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
JARMAH HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, BEN LALOUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKINGBOTTOM v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HICKINGBOTTOM
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GILBERT v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
DARYL GILBERT
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, RICHARD WHITE, PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richwine et al v. Matuszak et al
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Lauren Richwine and Death Done Differently LLC
Defendant:
Kathleen Diane Matuszak, Thomas Sproles, Frank Downing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FELLOWS v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
AARON FELLOWS
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
