Cases 71 - 80 of 1,304
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14532
Plaintiff:
Pink Floyd (1987) Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Gary Palmer, Gaurav Jha and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Li et al v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2023cv15485
Plaintiff:
Dongping Li, Xiaozhen Mai, Patrick McGuire and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Commissioner Matthew Beaudet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bishop v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2023cv13882
Plaintiff:
Madena Bishop
Defendant:
Jay Robert Pritzker, Mohammed A. Haq, Sara C. Phalen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MOTON v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
ELAINE PERDUE, JODIE MURPHY, KRISTINE PRYOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farage v. Murphy et al
as 2:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Kyle Farage
Defendant:
Dr Murphy and Julie Ludwig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Murphy v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2022cv02656
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Murphy
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation d/b/a Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Illinois doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois and Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018cv06785
In Re:
In Re: Local TV Advertising Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Cellino & Barnes, P.C., Walley's Auto Sales, Inc., Crowley Webb and Associates, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Tegna, Inc., Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., Hearst Communications, Inc. and others
Respondent:
The Nielsen Company (US), LLC
Special Master:
Richard Levie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
