Cases 71 - 80 of 586
Esposito v Watermark Lodging Trust, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03110
Plaintiff:
Orene Esposito
Defendant:
Watermark Lodging Trust, Inc., Michael G MEDZIGIAN, Brendan M MEDZIGIAN and others
Charles Simon v. DOJ, et al
as 22-1996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES SIMON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, U.S. District Court Judge, District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 20-0580, FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
BROWN v. SIMONE et al
as 1:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
GREGORY W. BROWN
Defendant:
SIMONE, FISH, ARTHUR NYEAYEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Simon, Charles v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Charles Simon
Defendant:
Department of Justice, En Banc U.S. Appeals Court, U.S. Appeals Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. James Simon
as 22-1789
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES A. SIMON
Williams II v. Whiteside County Public Officials et al
as 3:2022cv50137
Plaintiff:
Daniel Williams II
Defendant:
Whiteside County Public Officials, Sue R. Costello, Terry A. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Simon et al
as 3:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Ricky R Meeks
Defendant:
Lieutenant Simon, Daniel Monti and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Jeffreys, et al
as 1:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Ryan W. Campbell
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez, C/O Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
