Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 14,207
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01702
Plaintiff: LaShawn Clark
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Derrick G. Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Everson et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03320
Plaintiff: Ebony Everson, Sabrina Everson and Bobby Everson, Sr.
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kenneth Cowles, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1689
Plaintiff: KENNETH D. COWLES, III
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Parks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff: Janar Parks
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03257
Plaintiff: Freddrina Mae Jones
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Franshon Stapleton v. USA
as 24-1361
Petitioner: FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Government Employees Insurance Company v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03193
Plaintiff: Governent Employees Insurance Company a/s/o Anita Carton
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Placencia v. USA
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner: Michael L Placencia
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas Cureton v. USA
as 24-1663
Petitioner: THOMAS CURETON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maurice Gardner v. USA
as 24-1468
Petitioner: MAURICE D. GARDNER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?