Cases 81 - 90 of 7,236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Komkaran v. Rust-Oleum Corporation
as 1:2024cv01554
Plaintiff:
Andrew Komkaran
Defendant:
Rust-Oleum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Huberman v. A&D Performance, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv01484
Plaintiff:
Andrew Huberman
Defendant:
A&D Performance, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hardy v. Whitmyer et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Tracey A Hardy and Tracey Arnell Hardy
Defendant:
Andrew Whitmyer, Brian Schroth and Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Jackson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Necessary v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00401
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Andrew Necessary
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ANDREW COLE, SCHEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nykerk v. Jagdfeld et al
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Nykerk
Defendant:
Aaron Jagdfeld, York A. Ragen, Marcia J. Avedon and others
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
