Cases 81 - 90 of 187
Watkins v. Macavitt et al
as 1:2017cv01461
Plaintiff:
Jordan L Watkins
Defendant:
Brenda Macavitt, Gerald . Brady, Andrew Schulze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Mortara Instrument Inc
as 2:2017cv01342
Plaintiff:
Robert D Atkins
Defendant:
Mortara Instrument Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Penaloza v. C.C.D.O.C/Division 11 et al
as 1:2017cv07058
Plaintiff:
Nino Penaloza
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C/Division 11, Sherman, Villalobos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ahamad Atkins v. USA
as 17-2751
Petitioner - Appellant:
AHAMAD R. ATKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CLARK et al v. COOK GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv06069
Plaintiff:
ALMA DELIA AGUILAR, LINDA ALLEN, ANTHONY ATKINS and others
Defendant:
COOK GROUP INC., COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Carter v. Thomas et al
as 1:2017cv02690
Plaintiff:
Corrie Travail Carter
Defendant:
Sgt. Thomas, Sgt. Hein, Ofc. Samboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Atkins et al
as 1:2017cv01133
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Sims
Defendant:
William W.P. Atkins, Frederick Johnson and Johnson, Bunce, and Noble, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINS et al v. COOK MEDICAL LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALTER ATKINS and RHONDA L. ATKINS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Patterson v. Adams et al
as 1:2017cv01078
Plaintiff:
Wayne Patterson
Defendant:
Carol Adams, James Dimas, Michelle Saddler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
