Cases 81 - 90 of 485
James Dawson v. Rod Boyd, et al
as 21-1506
Defendant / Appellee:
CODY CURRY, JACOB HUSKINS, Corretional Officer, THOMAS HENDRICKS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES D. DAWSON
Curry v. Ward et al
as 1:2021cv00099
Defendant:
Stephen Reed, Brian Miller, Chad Schipper and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CURRIE v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Defendant:
HENSLEY, BUELTEL, NATHAN HASSLER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LORENZO CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Stump et al
as 1:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Penny Lake, Alan D Cook, Scott Sanderson and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Gallegos
as 1:2021cv00617
Defendant:
Timothy Evans, Kimberly Foxx, Joseph Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Respondent:
Evans, Amanda Gallegos, Executive Director, Cook County Jail, Bitar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Cook County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2021cv00452
Defendant:
Queen, Beachum, Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUNGATE et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06352
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ELAINE CURRY, BUFORD THOMAS TUNGATE and ANDREW TUNGATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. BARBER et al
as 1:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN
Defendant:
VIRGINIA CAUDILL, NATHAN PARTON, JOHN JAY BOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
