Cases 81 - 90 of 504
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Felske Hawkins, Cpt Kyle Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 1:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Natasha Hawkins
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hawkins et al v. Fagan
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hawkins and Anthony McClintock
Defendant:
Sean Fagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alamilla v. Stagecoach Leasing Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07332
Plaintiff:
Manuel Alamilla
Defendant:
Stagecoach Leasing Inc., Stagecoach Transportation LTD, Stagecoach Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HAWKINS-EL v. VANIHEL
as 1:2022cv02331
Petitioner:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAWKINS-EL v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00550
Petitioner:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Motley Crue, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv06371
Plaintiff:
Motley Crue, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, AAdevincol, ariqiyan32447 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
HAWKINS v. KALVAITIS
as 1:2022cv02009
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HAWKINS
Defendant:
KALVAITIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Rolando L Diaz
Defendant:
Ron D Neal, C Frediarelli, G Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Graham et al
as 3:2022cv03201
Plaintiff:
Justin Summers
Defendant:
Laura Graham, . Boerenson, Justin Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
