Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Brinkley v. Claude et al
as 1:2024cv03386
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Dr. Claude, Dr. Lombardi, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brinkley v. Dr. Claude et al
as 1:2023cv16116
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Dr. Claude, Dr. Lombardi, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Dr. Claude et al
as 1:2023cv15060
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Dr. Claude, Dr. Lombardi, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12090
Plaintiff:
Estelle Jarvis
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eric Boatman, et al v. Elijah Muhammad, et al
as 23-2624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC BOATMAN and CAROL JARVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIJAH MUHAMMAD, RAMON MCCALPINE, CITY OF HARVEY and others
Trustees of the Local 309 Electrical Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Jarvis Electrical Contracting, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02808
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Local 309 Electrical Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Local 309 Wireman's Pension Trust, Trustees of the Southwestern ILL. Joint Apprenticeship&Trng Comm and others
Defendant:
Jarvis Electrical Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hicks v. Milwaukee County Transport Service et al
as 2:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Florine Hicks
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Transport Service, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 998, Raymond Ma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
