Cases 1 - 10 of 28
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN, DANNY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jason Edmonson v. Nikki Schwebke, et al
as 23-3417
Plaintiff:
JASON L. EDMONSON
Defendant:
NIKKI SCHWEBKE, HEATH TOMLIN, TONY EMIL and others
Tomlin v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11297
Plaintiff:
Linda Tomlin
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edmonson v. Norman et al
as 2:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Jason L Edmonson
Defendant:
Eric Norman, Lt Nikki Schwebke, Heath Tomlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stankowski v. Carr et al
as 2:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Sean Stankowski
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Cindi Odonnell, Emily Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonson v. Kinton et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jason L Edmonson
Defendant:
Kinton, Rahn, Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tomlin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
George A Tomlin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Compton v. Toler et al
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeWayne Compton, Jr
Defendant:
CO Toler, Warden Cheryl Eplett, James Zanon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonson v. Rosen et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jason L Edmonson
Defendant:
Officer Rosen, Schroeder, CO Duprey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
