Cases 1 - 10 of 21
STRONG v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
SEAN STRONG
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. Hillsboro Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv03252
Plaintiff:
Mary McKenzie
Defendant:
Hillsboro Police Department, Montgomery County, Security National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ROBERT CARTER, KATHY ALVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD BROWN, LAGENAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. CARTER et al
as 3:2020cv00172
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DEA GOAD, KATHY ALVEY and others
Plaintiff:
TEVIN R. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 2:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON and SHAWNTRELL NORINGTON
Defendant:
GEORGE C. ZOLEY, NOAH SNIDER, DOUGLAS ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 1:2019cv01185
Defendant:
KRUL, GEORGE C. ZOLEY, M. LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOTKINS v. SAYLOR et al
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
SHAW, DAVIS, SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ARTHUR BOTKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2018cv02049
Defendant:
GOAD, ALLEE, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
