Cases 1 - 10 of 477
RealtyLink LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
RealtyLink LLC and IN Lebanon John Shaw LLC
Defendant:
City of Lebanon, Dick Robertson, John Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robertson v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00707
Petitioner:
Jermel Robertson
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WAYNE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, GARDENER, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARLEY v. ROBERTSON
as 1:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
LARRY FARLEY
Defendant:
EVALYN ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermel Robertson v. State of Wisconsin
as 24-1956
Petitioner:
JERMEL ROBERTSON
Respondent:
STATE OF WISCONSIN
FARLEY v. DOBBS et al
as 1:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
LARRY FARLEY
Defendant:
BRYAN DOBBS, KATHY GOEN, LEAH ARRINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LEON ROBERTSON, III
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board
as 2:2024cv02067
Petitioner:
Wesley M Robertson
Defendant:
Illinois Prisoner Review Board
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Chad Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hickman v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Hickman and Anthony Scott Hickman
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric J Holcomb, Todd Rokita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
