Cases 1 - 10 of 1,658
Garcia et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia and Leonardo Martinez
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Christopher Papaionnou, Dante Koeppen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50223
Plaintiff:
Justn Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
BRITTANY A. TORRES, KYLEIGH J. INGALIS, LETICIA MARTINEZ-MATEOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Mclean
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Martinez M Edwards
Defendant:
Joseph A Mclean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04580
Plaintiff:
Beverly Martinez
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
De La Cruz Martinez v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv50211
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Bobbi Jo Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50212
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania
as 3:2024cv50209
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. O'Barto
as 3:2024cv50207
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Gina O'Barto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
