Cases 1 - 10 of 54
ORR v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, BUTLER, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. LOWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Defendant:
LOWELL, NEFF, HELTERBRAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUDELA et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Michael Tudela and Abbey Tudela
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, Vanderburgh County Former Prosecutor Nicholas Hermann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
WALKER v. ARMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
ARMARK FOOD SERVICES, FRANK VANIHEL, CHRIS HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkhart v. Leasure et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NOBLE BURKHART
Defendant:
ROBERT W LEASURE, BETH A TAYLOR, GREGORY C DAVIS and others
WALKER v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, C. HOLCOMB, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neff v. Grant County Jail
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Neff
Defendant:
Grant County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Grant County Jail
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Cecil Johnson, Charles B. Neff and Chad Exey Hammond
Defendant:
Grant County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grobler v. Leasure et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
SERGIO GROBLER
Defendant:
ROBERT W LEASURE, BETH A TAYLOR, GREGORY C DAVIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
