Cases 1 - 10 of 357
Sherman, Andrew v. Radcliffe, Richard et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Sherman
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Richard A. Radcliffe, District Attorney Kevin Croninger and Attorney Rachel Pisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHERMAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SHERMAN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03852
Plaintiff:
BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC and THE BALDWIN GROUP COLLEAGUE, INC.
Defendant:
Michael Jones
Austin v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Defendant:
Joseph Sherman, Michael Hendricks and Bobby Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
After II Movie, LLC et al v. Sherman
as 1:2024cv01321
Plaintiff:
After II Movie, LLC, After Productions, LLC, After We Fell Productions, Ltd and others
Respondent:
Jerald Sherman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
AUSTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
EZRA SHERMAN HENRY AUSTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sherman v. Merrillville The Town of et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Chanel Sherman
Defendant:
Merrillville The Town of, Jesus Solis, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
