Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Simpson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv03238
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Simpson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MARTIN v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2026cv01555
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
PLAINFEILD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Lake County, Illinois et al
as 1:2026cv08774
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Love
Defendant:
Lake County, Illinois, Sheriff John Idleburg, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martin v. Plainfeild Correctional Facility
as 3:2026cv01091
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martin
Defendant:
Plainfeild Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. KARCHNER et al
as 1:2026cv01549
Plaintiff:
DE'QUAN ANTHONY COBB
Defendant:
KARCHNER and YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliot v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00984
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dion Elliot
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CARTER v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2026cv01523
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WAYNE CARTER
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 2:2026cv01266
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Love, Jr
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail, State of Wisconsin Government, Waukesha County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WARDEN
as 3:2026cv00163
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. WOODS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sonrai Systems, LLC v. Anthony Romano, et al
as 26-2493
Plaintiff:
SONRAI SYSTEMS, LLC
Defendant:
ANTHONY M. ROMANO and HEIL CO., doing business as ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS GROUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
