Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REED v. ARAMARK et al
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
BENNIE K. REED
Defendant:
ARAMARK, B. SMITH, D. BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. GASKIN et al
as 1:2021cv01950
Plaintiff:
Lowell B. Smith and LOWELL SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and Richard Gaskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COVINGTON v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE OF INDIANA L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00134
Defendant:
D. BEDWELL, B. SMITH and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE OF INDIANA L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
TODD COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTHALOW v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2021cv00010
Plaintiff:
DARYL BARTHALOW
Defendant:
B. SMITH and DAN BEDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06309
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. SMITH
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2020cv03248
Defendant:
TOMAW, BRAD, ROWL and others
Plaintiff:
JERALD BROUDE, RICHARD M. REEVES, PATRICK B. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PASSMORE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv00533
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, ROBERT CARTER, JR., ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHUMATE v. RIFFLE et al
as 2:2020cv00383
Defendant:
B. SMITH, K. HARTZELL, KODI RIFFLE and others
Plaintiff:
COLIN SHUMATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
