Cases 1 - 10 of 463
Boyd v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04658
Plaintiff:
Kenisha Boyd
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc., Avlon Industries, Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boyd v. Gary
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Boyd, III
Defendant:
Deputy Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
English v. Caruana et al
as 3:2024cv50084
Plaintiff:
Aaron Alvin English
Defendant:
Gary L. Caruana, Lt. Boyd, Robert Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell et al v. City Of Newton et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Frances Powell and Dakota Boyd
Defendant:
City Of Newton, Adam Deckard, Trevor Honomichl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell et al v. City Of Newton et al
as 2:2024cv02026
Plaintiff:
Frances Powell and Dakota Boyd
Defendant:
City Of Newton, Adam Deckard, Trevor Honomichl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farner v. Megan et al
as 3:2024cv50009
Plaintiff:
Joshua S Farner
Defendant:
Lt. Dan Boyd, C/O Rowan, MHP Megan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Boyd v. BJC Memorial Hospital Belleville
as 3:2023cv03961
Plaintiff:
Candrice Boyd
Defendant:
BJC Memorial Hospital Belleville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lawless v. Boyd et al
as 2:2023cv02281
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Lawless
Defendant:
Royal C Boyd and Dixie Trucking Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Boyd v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03733
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Gerald Boyd
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
