Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SWALLERS v. USA
as 1:2020cv01060
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
BRENT A. SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
STATE OF INDIANA v. SWALLERS
as 1:2018cv00419
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
SWALLERS v. USA
as 1:2018cv00125
Petitioner:
BRENT A. SWALLERS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
THE BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS ESTATE BY EXECUTOR BRENT-ALLEN v. ARVIN
as 1:2017cv04505
Defendant:
THOMAS ARVIN
Plaintiff:
THE BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS ESTATE BY EXECUTOR BRENT-ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
THE BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS ESTATE BY EXECUTOR BRENT-ALLEN v. WITTER
as 1:2017cv04467
Plaintiff:
BRENT- ALLEN, BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS and THE BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS ESTATE BY EXECUTOR BRENT-ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, BRENT WITTER and RICHARD L. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BRENT v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2017cv01776
Plaintiff:
BRENT
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY, STATE OF INDIANA, BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swallers v. Superintendent
as 1:2017cv00199
Petitioner:
Brent A Swallers
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRENT v. BRADY
as 1:2017cv01423
Respondent:
AMY BRADY
Petitioner:
BRENT
Relator:
BRENT A. SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRENT et al v. RINKA
as 1:2017cv01424
Plaintiff:
BRENT
Defendant:
MATT RINKA
Relator:
BRENT A. SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SWALLERS (OF THE HOUSE OF) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016mc00067
Defendant:
THOMAS J. ARVIN, TIM A. BAKER, IN FBI and others
Petitioner:
BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS (OF THE HOUSE OF)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
