Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Brinkley v. Claude et al
as 1:2024cv03386
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Dr. Claude, Dr. Lombardi, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Dr. Claude et al
as 1:2023cv16116
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Dr. Claude, Dr. Lombardi, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Dr. Claude et al
as 1:2023cv15060
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Dr. Claude, Dr. Lombardi, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Gray et al
as 1:2022cv06477
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
C Gray and N Montesinos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv05146
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Ofc. H Martinez, Ofc. Lakowski, Ofc. J Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Shapiro et al
as 1:2022cv04868
Plaintiff:
Eboni Williams, Debbie Shoemaker, Paula Mays and others
Defendant:
Gerald Shapiro, Scott Brinkley, Jamie Zelvin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Brinkley v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv04256
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Brinkley
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Serguey Klemens and Mario Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brinkley Bridges v. Randall Hepp
as 19-3107
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDALL HEPP
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRINKLEY L. BRIDGES
Bridges v. Hepp
as 1:2019cv01146
Respondent:
Warden Randall Hepp
Petitioner:
Brinkley L Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burke et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv02316
Plaintiff:
Shawn P. Clayton, Hardies Clayton and Ruthie Burke
Defendant:
William Morales, Star No. 1030, Matthew Ramirez, Star No. 14984, Angelina Alvear, Star No. 14141 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
