Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Suhr v. Dietrich et al
as 2:2023cv01697
Plaintiff:
Daniel Suhr
Defendant:
Dean R. Dietrich, Jane Ellen Bucher, Margaret Wrenn Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
MARK WESTERMAN v. BUCHER & CHRISTIAN CONSULTING, INC.
as 1:2020cv01224
Plaintiff:
MARK WESTERMAN
Defendant:
BUCHER & CHRISTIAN CONSULTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Day et al
as 2:2019cv01873
Defendant:
Audrey Bucher, Kenny Day and Teresa Wiegand
Plaintiff:
Darnell F Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Elkins-Watts et al
as 3:2019cv00300
Plaintiff:
Andre Nelson and Andre
Defendant:
Marlene Elkins-Watts, Alexandria Bucher and Mark Sevier
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOTTS v. BUCHER & CHRISTIAN CONSULTING, INC.
as 1:2019cv01186
Defendant:
Bucher & Christian Consulting, Inc. d/b/a BCForward, BUCHER & CHRISTIAN CONSULTING, INC. and BUCHER & CHRISTIAN CONSULTING, INC. doing business as BCFORWARD
Plaintiff:
Robert Shotts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BUCHER AND CHRISTIAN CONSULTING, INC. v. FUNDING METRICS, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01273
Plaintiff:
BUCHER AND CHRISTIAN CONSULTING, INC.
Defendant:
FORD RESOURCE GROUP, INC. and FUNDING METRICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Adams v. Bower et al
as 2:2017cv02061
Plaintiff:
John K Adams
Defendant:
Brian Bower, Thomas Bucher and Michael Shick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adams v. Tillis et al
as 2:2016cv02233
Plaintiff:
John K Adams
Defendant:
Lisa Tillis, James Rankin, . Kerry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
