Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lewis v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv14548
Plaintiff:
Aundrey C. Lewis
Defendant:
AFAM Concept Inc. dba JF Labs Inc., Avlon Industries Inc, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Totton v. Kramer et al
as 1:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Donald Kramer, C Lewis, Doctor Berke and others
Plaintiff:
Damelan Totton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Kramer et al
as 1:2017cv05461
Plaintiff:
Bobby J. Heard
Defendant:
Donald Kramer, C. Lewis, C. Conklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Kramer et al
as 1:2017cv03435
Plaintiff:
Bobby J. Heard
Defendant:
Donald Kramer, C. Lewis, C. Conklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguirre v. Bloomfield et al
as 4:2015cv04065
Plaintiff:
Jaime L Aguirre
Defendant:
Pamela Bloomfield, Unknown Others and C. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2013cv04801
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Aaron , Alice Aaron , Darnella Abrams and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2772
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vincent Lewis v. Michael Meisner
as 12-1202
Petitioner:
VINCENT C. LEWIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL MEISNER
OUTLAW v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00781
Defendant:
MICHELLE BERTRAM, ROBIN BLATTNER, MARK CHARPENTIER, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY OUTLAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Eisenberg et al
as 2:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jasmine C Lewis
Defendant:
Alan D Eisenberg and James M Zarzynski
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
