Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
DANT CLAYTON CORPORATION v. SLOCUM
as 4:2024cv00095
Defendant:
ODELIZA J. SOLCUM
Plaintiff:
DANT CLAYTON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Garcia et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia and Leonardo Martinez
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Christopher Papaionnou, Dante Koeppen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Falls v. Jerome et al
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Sherald Dante Falls
Defendant:
Waupun Correctional Institution, Dr Robert Jerome, A Panos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Btisza et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Plaintiff:
Dante Rodgers
Defendant:
Btisza, Kacey and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Dante Rodgers
Defendant:
R Ramirez, X Saldana, R Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Guy v. English et al
as 3:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Dante D Guy and Dante Guy
Defendant:
Brian English, M Morson and Isaac Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffries v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv15097
Plaintiff:
Dante Jeffries
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
