Cases 1 - 10 of 18
GARNER-JONES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv02928
Plaintiff:
TARRA GARNER-JONES
Defendant:
ROB CARTER, DENNIS REAGLE, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv02864
Plaintiff:
PAUL ERIC BROWN
Defendant:
THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2 and others
4Th Party Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DALTON v. PONY INDY, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00581
Plaintiff:
ARIEL DALTON
Defendant:
PONY INDY, LLC, MIKE WALLACE, CHARLES GERALD WESTLUND, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
ALLEN v. DOE 1-4 et al
as 2:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLEN and DAVID HOLDER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-4 and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Doe 1-4 et al
as 4:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
David Allen and David Holder
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 13131
CROWDUS et al v. SCHNUCK MARKETS, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00207
Defendant:
4Q FARMS, LLC, C & E FARMS, INC., C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOE CROWDUS and RACHAEL CROWDUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OSTERUD v. SCHNUCK SUPERMARKETS, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-4, SCHNUCK SUPERMARKETS, INC. and VAUGHAN FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff:
BREEA OSTERUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
