Cases 1 - 10 of 840
THOMAS v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
BRONCO MORGAN
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, ASHLEY MOSELEY, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKLEY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLAKLEY
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, K. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEZ Corp. v. Cacciato et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
MEZ Corp.
Defendant:
Mathew Cacciato, Frank Cacciato, Katherine Cacciato and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MORGAN v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00294
Petitioner:
MICHAEL W. MORGAN
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. REGAL et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
ALTON LEON TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REGAL, FRANK VANIHEL and ERIC J. HOLCOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVINGTON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
TODD E. COVINGTON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, RANDALL, TRAVIS DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraballo v. Forgey et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Frank Caraballo
Defendant:
William Forgey, M.D., Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., William Forgey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
GABALDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
FRANK GABALDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ridley v. Vanihel et al
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daren Earl Ridley and Daren E Ridley
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, K Gilmore, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
