Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hill v. Naphcare Inc et al
as 4:2026cv04184
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo D Hill
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc, Jim McLane, Bradford T McLane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Reesman v. Rite-Hite Holding Corporation
as 2:2025cv01640
Plaintiff:
Brittnie Reesman
Defendant:
Rite-Hite Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Tarasovsky et al v. AZE, INC. et al
as 1:2025cv05285
Plaintiff:
Konstantin Tarasovsky
Defendant:
AZE, INC., E&O SOLUTIONS, INC., PRICE RITE TRANSPORT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
McIntyre v. Van Rite et al
as 2:2025cv00012
Defendant:
E. Meyer, Timothy Michels, Pavale Popovich and others
Plaintiff:
DeJuan McIntyre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Rite Aid Culver City
as 2:2024cv01672
Defendant:
Rite Aid Culver City
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pretrial Service:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
