Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
SEIU Local 1 & Participating Employers Health Trust et al v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
as 1:2022cv05939
Plaintiff:
SEIU Local 1 & Participating Employers Health Trust and SEIU Local 1 & Participating Employers Pension Trust
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local Union No. 9, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Adesta, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06066
Plaintiff:
Local Union No. 9, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Defendant:
Adesta, LLC and G4S Secure Integration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Delorean Bryson v. Michael Rowe, et al
as 21-2768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELOREAN L. BRYSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL ROWE, G4S, SERGEANT BARBER and others
Bryson v. Rowe et al
as 2:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Delorean L Bryson
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Barber, Lt Hodel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saffold v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 2:2019cv01414
Defendant:
WellPath, G4S Transportation Services and Milwaukee County Jail
Plaintiff:
Clarence Albert Saffold, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Armor Health Care et al
as 2:2019cv01184
Defendant:
Armor Health Care, G4S Transportation Services, MMHI Hospitals and others
Plaintiff:
James A Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
