Cases 1 - 10 of 23
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02047
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, GREG HOLCUMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'BRIEN v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2023cv02015
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM O'BRIEN
Defendant:
JACKSON, BISHOP PROPERTY OFFICER, SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. MARTZ et al
as 1:2023cv01898
Plaintiff:
CHALLIE A. GRAY
Defendant:
MARTZ, BYERS, GOODNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. GOODNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Defendant:
GREG GOODNIGHT, TYLER MOORE, CITY OF KOKOMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. STORM et al
as 1:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
K. STORM, E. OLSON, GRIEVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. TERRY et al
as 1:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LEWIS
Defendant:
TERRY, FAWVER, JESSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. SURGUY et al
as 1:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
SURGUY, T. SOLOMON, R. GOODNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESLICK v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv02415
Plaintiff:
RYAN LEE ESLICK
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, WILLIAM WILSON, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS et al v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2022cv02184
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGAL, EDMONDS, A. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
