Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Shambaugh & Son, L.P. v. Reichhart et al
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Shambaugh & Son, L.P.
Defendant:
Matthew Reichhart, Eric Hite and Bobby Elliott
Hite v. Marshall Co Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00676
Defendant:
Holcomb and Marshall Co Jail
Plaintiff:
Jason Hite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEIMER v. MENARD, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00093
Plaintiff:
ADAM WEIMER
Defendant:
MENARD, INC. and STEWART HITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KeyBank National Association v G & M Pride Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00243
Defendant:
G & M PRIDE, INC. d/b/a FAUBION PLUMBING, HEATING and A/C, Marcus D Hite, G & M Pride Inc and others
Plaintiff:
KeyBank National Association, a national banking association and KeyBank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Portage City of et al
as 2:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
Larry King, III
Defendant:
Portage City of, Wendell Hite, Robert Demitroulas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milligan v. Portage City of, et al
as 2:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Milligan
Defendant:
Portage City of , David Prickett , John Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Carter et al
as 3:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
Lane Grant Dodson
Defendant:
Douglas Carter , David Bacon , Matthew Emenhiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANCINI et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2016cv02048
Plaintiff:
K. C. and MARA MANCINI
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DOES 1-50, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, et al
as 1:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
MAJOR P. DAVIS, II
Defendant:
NICHOLAS GALICO, RICHARD HITE, JOSEPH HOGSETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAN v. LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2015mc00113
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE SARAH EVANS BARKER, CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
