Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Pernell v. Does #1-7 et al
as 3:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Arya Milan Pernell and Aaron Pernell
Defendant:
John Does #1-7, Dan Sproul, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 2:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Segal et al
as 1:2022cv01165
Petitioner:
Donato Perez
Respondent:
Michael Segal, Barb Von Blanckensee and Ian Connors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Landis v. Murton et al
as 3:2021cv50340
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Defendant:
Murton, Erskine, Maybury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bralen Jordan v. USA, et al
as 21-1171
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Bralen Jordan v. BOP, et al
as 21-1058
Defendant / Appellee:
IAN CONNORS, National Inmate Appeal Administrator and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Jordan v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv50514
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
Ian Connors, Jeffrey Ray Ormond, Kevin Kerbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bralen Jordan v. Ian Connors
as 20-3359
Defendant / Appellee:
IAN CONNORS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Jordan v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv50456
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Ian Connors
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landis v. Shellhammer et al
as 3:2020cv50447
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Ian Connors, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
