Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Joshua, Jimmie v. Fuchs, Larry et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Joshua, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry Fuchs, D. Fofana, Dr. Kammer and others
Not Yet Classified:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CULLEY v. MILLER et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE CULLEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. MILLER, L. OSBORN, J. TRAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CULLEY v. FERGUSON et al
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE CULLEY, JR.
Defendant:
CHAD FERGUSON and DAVE WEDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jimmie Culley, Jr. v. Rodney Miller, et al
as 22-3197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMIE LEE CULLEY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY MILLER, Deputy, LOGAN OSBORNE, Deputy, JAMES TRAPP, Deupty and others
Ellis v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Ellis
Defendant:
Rodney Gonzales and Milwaukee Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAVE v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02061
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE NAVE JR
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC and SAMUEL J. BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00415
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Booker and Inez Booker
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grimes v. Powers et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Crystal Powers, John or Jane Doe and Kevin A Carr
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Grimes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hudson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03918
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Hudson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
