Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,820
King v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04887
Plaintiff: Gail King
Defendant: L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bergeron Davila v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff: Raymond J Bergeron Davila
Defendant: Lt Marcus King, CO Palacios, CO Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04748
Plaintiff: Deanna King
Defendant: Commissioner Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04680
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04642
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04494
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
KING et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Petitioner: DANIEL C. KING
Respondent: INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berendt et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04310
Plaintiff: WILLIAM BERENDT, XAVIER KING, HUGO ORELLANA and others
Defendant: AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
USA v. Adam King
as 24-1909
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ADAM STAFFORD KING
Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson v. King et al
as 2:2024cv02113
Plaintiff: Amy Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson
Defendant: Jerry King and Village of Rantoul, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?