Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Lush, Stephen v. Taylor, Christine et al
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Christine Lyn Taylor, Carlo Esqueda, Valerie L. Bailey-Rihn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Darrell Bailey
as 23-2118
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARRELL L. BAILEY
Bailey v. Ill. Dept. of Healthcare & FS et al
as 1:2023cv03129
Plaintiff:
Lloyd L Bailey
Defendant:
Ill. Dept. of Healthcare & FS, Milwaukee Co Child Support and Angelique Chambliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
BAILEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE L. BAILEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, JOHN NWANNUNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv02435
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE L. BAILEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, JOHN NWANNUNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Truitt et al
as 1:2022cv06582
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Bailey
Defendant:
Warden Charles Truitt, Vicki Dunlap and F. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Truitt et al
as 1:2022cv06472
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Bailey
Defendant:
Charles Truitt, Vicki Dunlap and F. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv01117
Petitioner:
DONALD L. BAILEY
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAILEY v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv02517
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. YOUNG, CHANDLER and PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. YOUNG, CHANDLER and PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
