Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BARNHART v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC LIBRARY et al
as 1:2026cv02340
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, JIMMY REDMOND and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRYAN BARNHART, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Bourdage v. Stark et al
as 1:2026cv13142
Plaintiff:
Sherri Bourdage
Defendant:
Thomas Stark, Jill Granier, John/Jane Doe Chicago Public Library Employee(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARNHART v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC LIBRARY et al
as 1:2026cv02285
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRYAN BARNHART, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC LIBRARY, JOHN PATRICK HELLING, NAOMI RENEE KONJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arita v. Walton et al
as 1:2026cv12361
Plaintiff:
Luis Arita
Defendant:
Sadie Walton, Nick Fernandez, Redacted Employee #1 see exhibit 1 and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helm, Jacob v. Madison Public Library et al
as 3:2026cv00576
Plaintiff:
Jacob Helm
Defendant:
The Madison Public Library, Olivia, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Flowers v. Dillman et al
as 3:2026cv00455
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
C/O Dillman, C/O Choats, Menard Law Library and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Justin Credico v. Carmel Clay Public Library, et al
as 26-1498
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant:
CARMEL CLAY PUBLIC LIBRARY and BETH MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
