Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Polzin, Michael v. Kelm, Kerry et al
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Polzin
Defendant:
Kerry Kelm, Jonathan Lundeen and Andrew Maki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lundeen v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq01584
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Lundeen
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Lundeen v. GC Services, LP
as 1:2019cv01259
Defendant:
GC Services, LP
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lundeen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jenkins, Donta v. Frisch et al
as 3:2016cv00684
Plaintiff:
Donta Jenkins
Defendant:
Frisch , Huenke , Norge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Lundeen, Sr. v. Nicholas Rhoad, et al
as 16-2019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. LUNDEEN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS RHOAD, Director of the Indiana Professional Licensing Agnecy, STEPHEN L. HUDDLESTON, President, Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, AMBER SWARTZELL, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Indiana and others
James Lundeen, Sr. v. Nicholas Rhoad
as 16-1506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. LUNDEEN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS RHOAD, Execuitve Director of the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency, in his official capacity (Substituted)
LUNDEEN v. RHOAD et al
as 1:2014cv00547
Defendant:
STEPHEN HUDDLESTON, FRANCES L. KELLY, NICHOLAS RHOAD and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. LUNDEEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LUNDEEN v. KELLY
as 1:2013cv00547
Defendant:
FRANCES L. KELLY
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. LUNDEEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lundeen v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Lundeen
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
