Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Tyler v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv04803
Plaintiff:
Sean Tyler
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Kenneth Boudreau, James O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, M. BRYANT, C. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, D. ALSIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00313
Defendant:
JARED MYNATT, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkisson v. Moser et al
as 2:2021cv00384
Plaintiff:
Jessica Adkisson
Defendant:
Lisa Moser, Laura Bernacki Stafford and Mary A. DeBoer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morfin v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2021cv05525
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Morfin
Defendant:
Scott Cassidy, Neil Linehan, Colleen Hyland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REXROAT v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
BRANDON REXROAT
Defendant:
REAGLE, BODMAN, LT. PFLEEGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Administrator of the Estate of Former Chicago Police Department Commander Jon Burge et al
as 1:2021cv04231
Plaintiff:
Keith Walker
Defendant:
Administrator of the Estate of Former Chicago Police Department Commander Jon Burge, Daniel McWeeny, John Halloran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
