Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Mayweather v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramon Thomas Mayweather
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Sara Hugo and Barbara Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayweather-Brown - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. English et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Quintin Jamar Mayweathers-Brown and Quintin J Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Jayson English, Robert Carter, Jr, John Galipeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayweather v. Schmealing
as 2:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramon Thomas Mayweather
Defendant:
Christopher Schmealing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Warden et al
as 3:2020cv00305
Defendant:
Farlee, Westville Office of Internal Affairs, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Quintin J Mayweather-Brown and Quintin J Mayweather-Brown - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Galipeau
as 3:2020cv00153
Plaintiff:
Quintin J Mayweather-Brown and Quintin J Mayweather-Brown - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS
Defendant:
John Galipeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Sevier
as 3:2019cv00409
Plaintiff:
Quintin J Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Sevier
as 3:2019cv00252
Plaintiff:
Quintin J Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather v. Racine County Jail et al
as 2:2018cv01680
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramon Mayweather, Sr
Defendant:
Christopher Schmaling and Racine County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Sevier
as 3:2018cv00712
Plaintiff:
Quintin J Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Sevier
as 3:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
Quintin J Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
