Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Antonia Gonzalez-Nunez v. Jason Mishelow, et al
as 24-1132
Plaintiff:
ANTONIA M. GONZALEZ-NUNEZ
Defendant:
JASON M. MISHELOW, Assistant Family Court Commissioner, JESSICA MARQUEZ MURPHY, Guardian Ad Litem, ANA BERRIOS-SCHROEDER, Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge and others
Antonia Gonzalez-Nunez v. Jason Mishelow, et al
as 24-1123
Plaintiff:
ANTONIA M. GONZALEZ-NUNEZ
Defendant:
JASON M. MISHELOW, Assistant Family Court Commissioner, JESSICA MARQUEZ MURPHY, Guardian Ad Litem, ANA BERRIOS-SCHROEDER, Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Mishelow et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Jason Mishelow, Thomas McAdams, Jessica Marquez Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAdams v. Global Tel Link Corporation
as 3:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
Alexander McAdams
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence Fitch v. Thomas McAdams, et al
as 22-2522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE FITCH
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS MCADAMS, LISA BANGERT, JAMES SULLIVAN and others
Scott v. Waterstraat et al
as 3:2022cv03116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Waterstraat, . Bowen, John Doe, 11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. McAdams et al
as 2:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Terrence Fitch
Defendant:
Thomas McAdams, James Sullivan, Lisa Bangert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mariotti, Alasdair v. Ryczek, Bethany
as 3:2021cv00158
Respondent:
Bethany Rose Ryczek
Petitioner:
Alasdair David McAdam Mariotti
MCADAMS v. BIRD RIDES, INC.
as 1:2020cv01759
Plaintiff:
TODD MCADAMS
Defendant:
BIRD RIDES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
